Comments on: Bruce’s Deadly Fingers (1976) Review

By: Mighty Peking Man

Mighty Peking Man — Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:08:18 +0000

Andrew… thanks for the comment. The author (Matt) of the review definitely knows the topic. We have a bunch of other bruceploitation films reviewed (some are as in-depth as this one, others are short), but be sure to check ’em out.

By: Andrew H.

Andrew H. — Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:50:40 +0000

Thanks, this was an interesting piece (and I really appreciate the detailed contextual background as a newbie to these set of films in particular).

By: Mighty Peking Man

Mighty Peking Man — Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:00:11 +0000

In reply to Alvin George.

Even nora couldn’t save this one. I haven’t seen all of Le’s films, but from what I have seen, I think I’ll take “Enter the Game of Death”. How can you go wrong with a movie that’s ALL of Bruce Lee’s movies rolled into one?

By: Alvin George

Alvin George — Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:13:15 +0000

In reply to Mighty Peking Man.

MPM, is “Bruce’s Deadly Fingers” your all-time favorite Bruce Le movie? After all, Nora Miao’s in it!

By: William Fluker

William Fluker — Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:42:17 +0000

Finger Technique #8 for the Fatality, Love this movie!

By: Mighty Peking Man

Mighty Peking Man — Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:11:29 +0000

Funny you bring the Bond reference up. Was just watching SPY WHO LOVED ME the other day (microfilm).

By: DougWonnacott

DougWonnacott — Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:30:23 +0000

Hate to be ‘that guy’ but I thought I should point out that the term ‘McGuffin’ was actually created by Alfred Hitchcock in the 1960s. He uses it to describe the thing in a film that the characters care about and the plot revolves around, but as a viewer you don’t directly care about, other than needing it to make the plot work.

An example would be most James Bond films, where Bond needs to recover a microfilm/lector/hardrive or whatever with secret plans on it. We don’t care about the object, but we do care that Bond is trying to get it.